Styles of Reasoning in the British Life Sciences

Shared Assumptions, 1820–1858

I learned a great deal from Elwick’s book about matters relevant, not just to my interest in the history of the period in question, but also to issues still at stake in contemporary philosophy of biology. Historians and philosophers of biology alike have much to gain from reading it.
Journal of the History of Biology

Elwick explores how the concept of “compound individuality” brought together life scientists working in pre-Darwinian London. Scientists conducting research in comparative anatomy, physiology, cellular microscopy, embryology and the neurosciences repeatedly stated that plants and animals were compounds of smaller independent units. Discussion of a “bodily economy” was widespread. But by 1860, the most flamboyant discussions of compound individuality had come to an end in Britain. Elwick relates the growth and decline of questions about compound individuality to wider nineteenth-century debates about research standards and causality. He uses specific technical case studies to address overarching themes of reason and scientific method.

244 Pages, 6 x 9 in.

December, 2020

isbn : 9780822966340

about the author

James Elwick

James Elwick is associate professor of science and technology studies at York University. He is the author of Styles of Reasoning in the British Life Sciences: Shared Assumptions, 1820–1858, and currently works on how standardized achievement tests actually became standardized.

learn more
James Elwick