From the sixteenth to the eighteenth century, new anatomical investigations of the brain and the nervous system, together with a renewed interest in comparative anatomy, allowed doctors and philosophers to ground their theories on sense perception, the emergence of human intelligence, and the soul/body relationship in modern science. They investigated the anatomical structures and the physiological processes underlying the rise, differentiation, and articulation of human cognitive activities, and looked for the “anatomical roots” of the specificity of human intelligence when compared to other forms of animal sensibility.
This edited volume focuses on medical and philosophical debates on human intelligence and animal perception in the early modern age, providing fresh insights into the influence of medical discourse on the rise of modern philosophical anthropology. Contributions from distinguished historians of philosophy and medicine focus on sixteenth-century zoological, psychological, and embryological discourses on man; the impact of mechanism and comparative anatomy on philosophical conceptions of body and soul; and the key status of sensibility in the medical and philosophical enlightenment.
This volume makes an original contribution to the rising scholarship of the anthropological difference in early modern thinking and its intersection with philosophy, medicine, and other fields. This is serious, innovative, and rewarding international scholarship. It adds historical depth to the constantly growing and highly important global study of human-animal relations.
A very welcome addition to the growing literature that takes seriously medicine's importance in early modern thought. Touching on vital themes of human-animal relations not just in the histories of philosophy and medicine but in a variety of disciplines, this book deserves close and deep study.
Human & Animal Cognition in Early Modern Philosophy & Medicine has much to offer to historians through its close philosophical examinations of what may be conceived as part of biology during the early modern period. . . .The essays beautifully speak across disciplinary approaches and breathe life into old questions. . . .The volume. . .is valuable for those historians of the life sciences interested in expanding their perspectives on the fascinating, messy, nuanced debates of the early modern period.