News from Mars

Joshua Nall’s News from Mars makes a remarkable departure from the conventional frame of popularization studies, in which science is analyzed as part of the public sphere. Nall looks into the entanglements between mass journalism and the changing discipline of astronomy at the turn of the twentieth century through reports of controversies surrounding the Red Planet. By tracing astronomers’ practices in Mars observation and the circulation of their findings, Nall intends to analyze 'media in science' rather than 'science in media,' as he 'presents the public sphere as an essential component of scientific practice itself.' ... News from Mars is a sophisticated work demonstrating how the modern discipline of astronomy forged new norms and identities amid the changing world of journalism and mass culture. The most important contribution of this book is to provide a convincing analysis of the symbiotic relationship between the media and scientific communities.... readers from different backgrounds would benefit from Nall’s rigorous analysis. The book’s unconventional approach promises to be inspirational for those who are interested in what James Secord called 'knowledge in transit,' the early disciplinary development of planetary science, or simply the historical context of the Martian life and canals controversies.

Nall’s nuanced account of how astronomers attempted to discredit and compete with Proctor and Lowell shows that the disciplinary norms of professional astronomy emerged during, not before, the canal controversy.

Nall has written an important book, one that remaps the disciplinary landscape at a crucial period in the history of astronomy, moving us beyond over-simplified frameworks of popularization or anachronistic astronomical identities. . . . A refreshing and liberating take on a well-trodden subject. Highly recommended.

The late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries were marked, in many countries, by an insatiable appetite for news of the red planet. . . . Joshua Nall sets out to show us, in his impeccable book, how this vexing public fixation was a necessary and constitutive feature of ‘proper’ astronomy. . . . Nall’s account is cautiously and carefully set out, and very much convincing: an exemplary piece of work in the Lightman and Secord mode.

Controversies over the ‘canals’ some astronomers claimed to observe on Mars attracted huge public interest in the decades around 1900. Joshua Nall’s detailed study reveals how these debates were made possible by changes in the relationship between observers and the public shaped by new means of communication including the telegraph and the expansion of popular journalism. He argues that science itself was transformed as much by the experts’ efforts to communicate with the public as by the new equipment in their observatories. This is a study that will influence our understanding of a major episode in the history of science, but also our understanding of the nature of science itself.